Automated Warfare in Gaza: Examining the Horrific Implications of AI-Driven Targeting Systems in Future Conflicts

Posted By Terry Vermeylen


Disclaimer: This article does not represent a political stance on the conflicts discussed; rather, it focuses on the troubling implications of AI in warfare. It’s important to acknowledge that all war is devastating and tragic

In this continuing series of articles about AI, I am trying to educate people on how  AI is quickly and radically re-shaping the world for the better and for the worst.

The Israeli army’s AI-based program “Lavender” has dramatically reshaped military operations in Gaza, marking a significant shift towards the automation of warfare. This AI system processes surveillance data from Gaza to identify potential targets by assigning each individual a score that predicts their affiliation with militant groups like Hamas or PIJ. Those with high scores are automatically designated as military targets.

This technology has led to an alarming escalation in the pace and scale of operations, with minimal human oversight. Lavender’s influence was particularly pronounced during the early stages of the conflict, when it was reportedly responsible for decisions that led to substantial civilian casualties. The AI system, despite its sophistication, has a concerning margin of error; it has been noted that approximately 10% of the people it marked for targeting were wrongly identified as militants. This error rate translates into significant civilian casualties. For instance, during a specific period, over 15,000 Palestinian deaths were reported, nearly half of the total casualties at that time, many of whom were entire families wiped out in their homes​ (+972 Magazine)​​ (EL PAÍS English)​​ (Democracy Now!)​.


The use of AI like Lavender in warfare raises grave concerns, as it automates critical military decisions without robust safeguards or accountability. This situation underscores the urgent need for global governance to regulate AI in military operations. Without strict international guidelines and transparency, the balance between technological progress and humanitarian principles is at severe risk. It is imperative that global leaders establish comprehensive oversight to prevent increased civilian casualties and ensure accountability in the use of AI in conflicts​ (UPI)​.

Terry Vermeylen is a technology writer, IT project manager, and solution architect with extensive experience working with the world’s biggest companies, including advising the US Navy. His writings focus on the transformative impact of artificial intelligence across various industries, particularly in operational optimization.